Microsoft Office Training Classes in Buffalo, New York
Learn Microsoft Office in Buffalo, NewYork and surrounding areas via our hands-on, expert led courses. All of our classes either are offered on an onsite, online or public instructor led basis. Here is a list of our current Microsoft Office related training offerings in Buffalo, New York: Microsoft Office Training
Microsoft Office Training Catalog
subcategories
Business Analysis Classes
Course Directory [training on all levels]
- .NET Classes
- Agile/Scrum Classes
- AI Classes
- Ajax Classes
- Android and iPhone Programming Classes
- Blaze Advisor Classes
- C Programming Classes
- C# Programming Classes
- C++ Programming Classes
- Cisco Classes
- Cloud Classes
- CompTIA Classes
- Crystal Reports Classes
- Design Patterns Classes
- DevOps Classes
- Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring Classes
- Git, Jira, Wicket, Gradle, Tableau Classes
- IBM Classes
- Java Programming Classes
- JBoss Administration Classes
- JUnit, TDD, CPTC, Web Penetration Classes
- Linux Unix Classes
- Machine Learning Classes
- Microsoft Classes
- Microsoft Development Classes
- Microsoft SQL Server Classes
- Microsoft Team Foundation Server Classes
- Microsoft Windows Server Classes
- Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database Classes
- Perl Programming Classes
- Python Programming Classes
- Ruby Programming Classes
- Security Classes
- SharePoint Classes
- SOA Classes
- Tcl, Awk, Bash, Shell Classes
- UML Classes
- VMWare Classes
- Web Development Classes
- Web Services Classes
- Weblogic Administration Classes
- XML Classes
- RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX SYSTEMS ADMIN II
18 August, 2025 - 21 August, 2025 - RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX AUTOMATION WITH ANSIBLE
15 September, 2025 - 18 September, 2025 - Object-Oriented Programming in C# Rev. 6.1
15 September, 2025 - 19 September, 2025 - Object Oriented Analysis and Design Using UML
20 October, 2025 - 24 October, 2025 - Fast Track to Java 17 and OO Development
18 August, 2025 - 22 August, 2025 - See our complete public course listing
Blog Entries publications that: entertain, make you think, offer insight
Another blanket article about the pros and cons of Direct to Consumer (D2C) isn’t needed, I know. By now, we all know the rules for how this model enters a market: its disruption fights any given sector’s established sales model, a fuzzy compromise is temporarily met, and the lean innovator always wins out in the end.
That’s exactly how it played out in the music industry when Apple and record companies created a digital storefront in iTunes to usher music sales into the online era. What now appears to have been a stopgap compromise, iTunes was the standard model for 5-6 years until consumers realized there was no point in purchasing and owning digital media when internet speeds increased and they could listen to it for free through a music streaming service. In 2013, streaming models are the new music consumption standard. Netflix is nearly parallel in the film and TV world, though they’ve done a better job keeping it all under one roof. Apple mastered retail sales so well that the majority of Apple products, when bought in-person, are bought at an Apple store. That’s even more impressive when you consider how few Apple stores there are in the U.S. (253) compared to big box electronics stores that sell Apple products like Best Buy (1,100) Yet while some industries have implemented a D2C approach to great success, others haven’t even dipped a toe in the D2C pool, most notably the auto industry.
What got me thinking about this topic is the recent flurry of attention Tesla Motors has received for its D2C model. It all came to a head at the beginning of July when a petition on whitehouse.gov to allow Tesla to sell directly to consumers in all 50 states reached the 100,000 signatures required for administration comment. As you might imagine, many powerful car dealership owners armed with lobbyists have made a big stink about Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO and Product Architect, choosing to sidestep the traditional supply chain and instead opting to sell directly to their customers through their website. These dealership owners say that they’re against the idea because they want to protect consumers, but the real motive is that they want to defend their right to exist (and who wouldn’t?). They essentially have a monopoly at their position in the sales process, and they want to keep it that way. More frightening for the dealerships is the possibility that once Tesla starts selling directly to consumers, so will the big three automakers, and they fear that would be the end of the road for their business. Interestingly enough, the big three flirted with the idea of D2C in the early 90’s before they were met with fierce backlash from dealerships. I’m sure the dealership community has no interest in mounting a fight like that again.
To say that the laws preventing Tesla from selling online are peripherally relevant would be a compliment. By and large, the laws the dealerships point to fall under the umbrella of “Franchise Laws” that were put in place at the dawn of car sales to protect franchisees against manufacturers opening their own stores and undercutting the franchise that had invested so much to sell the manufacturer’s cars. There’s certainly a need for those laws to exist, because no owner of a dealership selling Jeeps wants Chrysler to open their own dealership next door and sell them for substantially less. However, because Tesla is independently owned and isn’t currently selling their cars through any third party dealership, this law doesn’t really apply to them. Until their cars are sold through independent dealerships, they’re incapable of undercutting anyone by implementing D2C structure.
In most business circles, the question of whether or not a website truly helps a company's business has become somewhat moot. Simply put, a website is a necessary evil, like it or not. The question is no longer, should a company have a website, but rather, is the website optimized to ensure the best potential results. Of course, it is important to understand what is meant by "helping a company."
Many businesses are under the assumption that a website is going to turn into cold hard cash for the company. Well, that could be the case if the organization is using a type of e-commerce platform to buy and sell goods. Many businesses are service oriented and as such, the website serves an entirely different purpose.
When it comes to running a start up, leaders need to make sure that their key players are motivated. This has been seen with many companies. Back in the 1970's it was found with the inspiration and diligence of the late Daniel Nigro when he formed Kleer-Fax. More recently it was seen in David Khasidy, the founder and recently retired president of SunRay Power Management, the most dynamic green energy leader in the US today.
The question is, what is it that great leaders like David Khasidy and Daniel Nigro do that make the difference? How do the most vulnerable companies (start ups) break the mold and become a part of our everyday lives?
It starts with their mission and vision.
Create a Strong Mission and Vision
There are many reasons why start ups fail. For one, they usually lack the capital to last through the lean times. Secondly, they often don't have the tolerance for setbacks that occur. Lastly, they do not have a long-term plan, also called a mission.
When a business has a strong mission, the team knows it and their focus toward their work and service to others within and without the company reflects that. To complement that, the shorter term vision of the company needs to be present as well.
This can even be seen in sole proprietorships with no employees, such as when Brian Pascale started his law practice. His vision was to find justice for his clients while his mission was to build upon a career that had already set precedents in the area of tort law.
As his practice has grown, new staff members can sense the vision and mission he exudes.
Encourage Ownership of Projects and Processes
Start ups need to inspire and motivate their employees because they need to know that they are not only a part of something important, but that their contributions mean something.
What won't happen if they are not there? What contribution do they make, and what are the consequences of them not fulfilling their part of the work?
By encouraging ownership in projects, team members can find that the work they are doing is not only important for the organization, but that they are going to be a big part of what makes it happen. The alternative is that they feel replaceable.
Offer Incentives That Keep the Company Competitive
When team members embrace the mission and vision of the company, and then take ownership for the company's success, they are going to need to be justly rewarded.
This could include flexible schedules (for those who don't need a stringent one), use of an account at a nearby takeout place, or even the potential for ownership as a result of a vesting program.
The incentive everyone is looking for more immediately, though, is cash. When the company takes in more revenue as a result of the efforts of those on the team, rewarding them can go a long way not only in making them feel appreciated, but in encouraging them to bring in more business.
Members of a start up team are usually very talented, and commonly underpaid. However, if they believe they are going somewhere, it will make a big difference.
Related:
Good non-programmer jobs for people with software developer experience
The Context Of Design Thinking And Its Application In Employee Skill Training
Tech Life in New York
Company Name | City | Industry | Secondary Industry |
---|---|---|---|
NYSE Euronext, Inc. | New York | Financial Services | Securities Agents and Brokers |
Anderson Instrument Company Inc. | Fultonville | Manufacturing | Tools, Hardware and Light Machinery |
News Corporation | New York | Media and Entertainment | Radio and Television Broadcasting |
Philip Morris International Inc | New York | Manufacturing | Manufacturing Other |
Loews Corporation | New York | Travel, Recreation and Leisure | Hotels, Motels and Lodging |
The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America | New York | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Jarden Corporation | Rye | Manufacturing | Manufacturing Other |
Ralph Lauren Corporation | New York | Retail | Clothing and Shoes Stores |
Icahn Enterprises, LP | New York | Financial Services | Investment Banking and Venture Capital |
Viacom Inc. | New York | Media and Entertainment | Media and Entertainment Other |
Omnicom Group Inc. | New York | Business Services | Advertising, Marketing and PR |
Henry Schein, Inc. | Melville | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Medical Supplies and Equipment |
Pfizer Incorporated | New York | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Pharmaceuticals |
Eastman Kodak Company | Rochester | Computers and Electronics | Audio, Video and Photography |
Assurant Inc. | New York | Business Services | Data and Records Management |
PepsiCo, Inc. | Purchase | Manufacturing | Nonalcoholic Beverages |
Foot Locker, Inc. | New York | Retail | Department Stores |
Barnes and Noble, Inc. | New York | Retail | Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, and Music Stores |
Alcoa | New York | Manufacturing | Metals Manufacturing |
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. | New York | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Personal Health Care Products |
Avon Products, Inc. | New York | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Personal Health Care Products |
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation | New York | Financial Services | Banks |
Marsh and McLennan Companies | New York | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Corning Incorporated | Corning | Manufacturing | Concrete, Glass, and Building Materials |
CBS Corporation | New York | Media and Entertainment | Radio and Television Broadcasting |
Bristol Myers Squibb Company | New York | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech | Biotechnology |
Citigroup Incorporated | New York | Financial Services | Banks |
Goldman Sachs | New York | Financial Services | Personal Financial Planning and Private Banking |
American International Group (AIG) | New York | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. | New York | Business Services | Advertising, Marketing and PR |
BlackRock, Inc. | New York | Financial Services | Securities Agents and Brokers |
MetLife Inc. | New York | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. | New York | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
Time Warner Cable | New York | Telecommunications | Cable Television Providers |
Morgan Stanley | New York | Financial Services | Investment Banking and Venture Capital |
American Express Company | New York | Financial Services | Credit Cards and Related Services |
International Business Machines Corporation | Armonk | Computers and Electronics | Computers, Parts and Repair |
TIAA-CREF | New York | Financial Services | Securities Agents and Brokers |
JPMorgan Chase and Co. | New York | Financial Services | Investment Banking and Venture Capital |
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. | New York | Media and Entertainment | Newspapers, Books and Periodicals |
L-3 Communications Inc. | New York | Manufacturing | Aerospace and Defense |
Colgate-Palmolive Company | New York | Consumer Services | Personal Care |
New York Life Insurance Company | New York | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Time Warner Inc. | New York | Media and Entertainment | Media and Entertainment Other |
Cablevision Systems Corp. | Bethpage | Media and Entertainment | Radio and Television Broadcasting |
CA Technologies, Inc. | Islandia | Software and Internet | Software |
Verizon Communications Inc. | New York | Telecommunications | Telephone Service Providers and Carriers |
Hess Corporation | New York | Energy and Utilities | Gasoline and Oil Refineries |
training details locations, tags and why hsg
The Hartmann Software Group understands these issues and addresses them and others during any training engagement. Although no IT educational institution can guarantee career or application development success, HSG can get you closer to your goals at a far faster rate than self paced learning and, arguably, than the competition. Here are the reasons why we are so successful at teaching:
- Learn from the experts.
- We have provided software development and other IT related training to many major corporations in New York since 2002.
- Our educators have years of consulting and training experience; moreover, we require each trainer to have cross-discipline expertise i.e. be Java and .NET experts so that you get a broad understanding of how industry wide experts work and think.
- Discover tips and tricks about Microsoft Office programming
- Get your questions answered by easy to follow, organized Microsoft Office experts
- Get up to speed with vital Microsoft Office programming tools
- Save on travel expenses by learning right from your desk or home office. Enroll in an online instructor led class. Nearly all of our classes are offered in this way.
- Prepare to hit the ground running for a new job or a new position
- See the big picture and have the instructor fill in the gaps
- We teach with sophisticated learning tools and provide excellent supporting course material
- Books and course material are provided in advance
- Get a book of your choice from the HSG Store as a gift from us when you register for a class
- Gain a lot of practical skills in a short amount of time
- We teach what we know…software
- We care…