Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring Training Classes in Madison, Wisconsin
Learn Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring in Madison, Wisconsin and surrounding areas via our hands-on, expert led courses. All of our classes either are offered on an onsite, online or public instructor led basis. Here is a list of our current Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring related training offerings in Madison, Wisconsin: Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring Training
Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring Training Catalog
subcategories
JavaScript Classes
Course Directory [training on all levels]
- .NET Classes
- Agile/Scrum Classes
- AI Classes
- Ajax Classes
- Android and iPhone Programming Classes
- Blaze Advisor Classes
- C Programming Classes
- C# Programming Classes
- C++ Programming Classes
- Cisco Classes
- Cloud Classes
- CompTIA Classes
- Crystal Reports Classes
- Design Patterns Classes
- DevOps Classes
- Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring Classes
- Git, Jira, Wicket, Gradle, Tableau Classes
- IBM Classes
- Java Programming Classes
- JBoss Administration Classes
- JUnit, TDD, CPTC, Web Penetration Classes
- Linux Unix Classes
- Machine Learning Classes
- Microsoft Classes
- Microsoft Development Classes
- Microsoft SQL Server Classes
- Microsoft Team Foundation Server Classes
- Microsoft Windows Server Classes
- Oracle, MySQL, Cassandra, Hadoop Database Classes
- Perl Programming Classes
- Python Programming Classes
- Ruby Programming Classes
- Security Classes
- SharePoint Classes
- SOA Classes
- Tcl, Awk, Bash, Shell Classes
- UML Classes
- VMWare Classes
- Web Development Classes
- Web Services Classes
- Weblogic Administration Classes
- XML Classes
- RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX SYSTEMS ADMIN II
18 August, 2025 - 21 August, 2025 - OpenShift Fundamentals
28 April, 2025 - 30 April, 2025 - Fast Track to Java 17 and OO Development
24 February, 2025 - 28 February, 2025 - RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX SYSTEMS ADMIN I
24 March, 2025 - 28 March, 2025 - DOCKER WITH KUBERNETES ADMINISTRATION
17 March, 2025 - 21 March, 2025 - See our complete public course listing
Blog Entries publications that: entertain, make you think, offer insight
Java still has its place in the world of software development, but is it quickly becoming obsolete by the more dynamically enabled Python programming language? The issue is hotly contested by both sides of the debate. Java experts point out that Java is still being developed with more programmer friendly updates. Python users swear that Java can take up to ten times longer to develop. Managers that need to make the best decision for a company need concrete information so that an informed and rational decision can be made.
First, Java is a static typed language while Python is dynamically typed. Static typed languages require that each variable name must be tied to both a type and an object. Dynamically typed languages only require that a variable name only gets bound to an object. Immediately, this puts Python ahead of the game in terms of productivity since a static typed language requires several elements and can make errors in coding more likely.
Python uses a concise language while Java uses verbose language. Concise language, as the name suggests, gets straight to the point without extra words. Removing additional syntax can greatly reduce the amount of time required to program. A simple call in Java, such as the ever notorious "Hello, World" requires three several lines of coding while Python requires a single sentence. Java requires the use of checked exceptions. If the exceptions are not caught or thrown out then the code fails to compile. In terms of language, Python certainly has surpassed Java in terms of brevity.
Additionally, while Java's string handling capabilities have improved they haven't yet matched the sophistication of Python's. Web applications rely upon fast load times and extraneous code can increase user wait time. Python optimizes code in ways that Java doesn't, and this can make Python a more efficient language. However, Java does run faster than Python and this can be a significant advantage for programmers using Java. When you factor in the need for a compiler for Java applications the speed factor cancels itself out leaving Python and Java at an impasse.
While a programmer will continue to argue for the language that makes it easiest based on the programmer's current level of knowledge, new software compiled with Python takes less time and provides a simplified coding language that reduces the chance for errors. When things go right, Java works well and there are no problems. However, when errors get introduced into the code, it can become extremely time consuming to locate and correct those errors. Python generally uses less code to begin with and makes it easier and more efficient to work with.
Ultimately, both languages have their own strengths and weaknesses. For creating simple applications, Python provides a simpler and more effective application. Larger applications can benefit from Java and the verbosity of the code actually makes it more compatible with future versions. Python code has been known to break with new releases. Ultimately, Python works best as a type of connecting language to conduct quick and dirty work that would be too intensive when using Java alone. In this sense, Java is a low-level implementation language. While both languages are continuing to develop, it's unlikely that one language will surpass the other for all programming needs in the near future.
Python and Ruby, each with roots going back into the 1990s, are two of the most popular interpreted programming languages today. Ruby is most widely known as the language in which the ubiquitous Ruby on Rails web application framework is written, but it also has legions of fans that use it for things that have nothing to do with the web. Python is a big hit in the numerical and scientific computing communities at the present time, rapidly displacing such longtime stalwarts as R when it comes to these applications. It too, however, is also put to a myriad of other uses, and the two languages probably vie for the title when it comes to how flexible their users find them.
A Matter of Personality...
That isn't to say that there aren't some major, immediately noticeable, differences between the two programming tongues. Ruby is famous for its flexibility and eagerness to please; it is seen by many as a cleaned-up continuation of Perl's "Do What I Mean" philosophy, whereby the interpreter does its best to figure out the meaning of evening non-canonical syntactic constructs. In fact, the language's creator, Yukihiro Matsumoto, chose his brainchild's name in homage to that earlier language's gemstone-inspired moniker.
Python, on the other hand, takes a very different tact. In a famous Python Enhancement Proposal called "The Zen of Python," longtime Pythonista Tim Peters declared it to be preferable that there should only be a single obvious way to do anything. Python enthusiasts and programmers, then, generally prize unanimity of style over syntactic flexibility compared to those who choose Ruby, and this shows in the code they create. Even Python's whitespace-sensitive parsing has a feel of lending clarity through syntactical enforcement that is very much at odds with the much fuzzier style of typical Ruby code.
For example, Python's much-admired list comprehension feature serves as the most obvious way to build up certain kinds of lists according to initial conditions:
a = [x**3 for x in range(10,20)]
b = [y for y in a if y % 2 == 0]
first builds up a list of the cubes of all of the numbers between 10 and 19 (yes, 19), assigning the result to 'a'. A second list of those elements in 'a' which are even is then stored in 'b'. One natural way to do this in Ruby is probably:
a = (10..19).map {|x| x ** 3}
b = a.select {|y| y.even?}
but there are a number of obvious alternatives, such as:
a = (10..19).collect do |x|
x ** 3
end
b = a.find_all do |y|
y % 2 == 0
end
It tends to be a little easier to come up with equally viable, but syntactically distinct, solutions in Ruby compared to Python, even for relatively simple tasks like the above. That is not to say that Ruby is a messy language, either; it is merely that it is somewhat freer and more forgiving than Python is, and many consider Python's relative purity in this regard a real advantage when it comes to writing clear, easily understandable code.
And Somewhat One of Performance
HP is taking legal action against Oracle for allegedly breaching its 2010 partnership agreement of porting HP’s core software products with the latest versions of Itanium. In March, Oracle announced it would not be developing any new versions for products designed for the Itanium processor. Itanium has the ability to power the so-called Business Critical Systems hardware for extremely demanding enterprise applications. However, Oracle said the chip line is about to die.
The companies’ lawyer met in the Santa Clara County Superior Court with Judge James Kleinberg presiding to discuss their side of the event. Others in the courtroom included Ann Livermore, HP board member and former enterprise business chief, and Oracle’s co-President Safra Catz. Catz and Livermore were the two key negotiators for the agreement. Livermore was to testify later in the day. Kleinberg is set to rule if the companies had a legally binding contract.
Jeff Thomas, HP’s lawyer, focused on the so-called Hurd Agreement wording, where the companies reiterated their partnership after Oracle hired Mark Hurd, former CEO for HP. HP also sued Hurd for breaking the confidentiality agreement.
Thomas and the lead lawyer for Oracle focused on one paragraph of the agreement, which read Oracle would continue to provide its product suite on the HP platform in a way that’s consistent with the existing partnership before Hurd’s hiring.
Tech Life in Wisconsin
Company Name | City | Industry | Secondary Industry |
---|---|---|---|
We Energies | Milwaukee | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
Bemis Company, Inc. | Neenah | Manufacturing | Plastics and Rubber Manufacturing |
Regal Beloit Corporation | Beloit | Manufacturing | Tools, Hardware and Light Machinery |
Manitowoc Company, Inc | Manitowoc | Manufacturing | Heavy Machinery |
Briggs and Stratton Corporation | Milwaukee | Manufacturing | Tools, Hardware and Light Machinery |
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation (MGIC) | Milwaukee | Financial Services | Lending and Mortgage |
A.O. Smith Corporation | Milwaukee | Manufacturing | Tools, Hardware and Light Machinery |
Sentry Insurance | Stevens Point | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Rockwell Automation, Inc. | Milwaukee | Manufacturing | Tools, Hardware and Light Machinery |
Bucyrus International, Inc. | South Milwaukee | Manufacturing | Heavy Machinery |
Diversey, Inc. | Sturtevant | Manufacturing | Chemicals and Petrochemicals |
Alliant Energy Corporation | Madison | Energy and Utilities | Gas and Electric Utilities |
Plexus Corp. | Neenah | Manufacturing | Manufacturing Other |
Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. | Madison | Manufacturing | Tools, Hardware and Light Machinery |
Kohl's Corporation | Menomonee Falls | Retail | Department Stores |
Snap-on Tools, Inc. | Kenosha | Manufacturing | Tools, Hardware and Light Machinery |
Fiserv, Inc. | Brookfield | Software and Internet | Data Analytics, Management and Storage |
CUNA Mutual Group | Madison | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Oshkosh Corporation | Oshkosh | Manufacturing | Heavy Machinery |
Modine Manufacturing Company | Racine | Manufacturing | Manufacturing Other |
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company | Milwaukee | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Joy Global Inc. | Milwaukee | Manufacturing | Heavy Machinery |
Harley-Davidson, Inc. | Milwaukee | Manufacturing | Automobiles, Boats and Motor Vehicles |
American Family Insurance | Madison | Financial Services | Insurance and Risk Management |
Johnson Controls, Inc. | Milwaukee | Manufacturing | Heavy Machinery |
ManpowerGroup | Milwaukee | Business Services | HR and Recruiting Services |
training details locations, tags and why hsg
The Hartmann Software Group understands these issues and addresses them and others during any training engagement. Although no IT educational institution can guarantee career or application development success, HSG can get you closer to your goals at a far faster rate than self paced learning and, arguably, than the competition. Here are the reasons why we are so successful at teaching:
- Learn from the experts.
- We have provided software development and other IT related training to many major corporations in Wisconsin since 2002.
- Our educators have years of consulting and training experience; moreover, we require each trainer to have cross-discipline expertise i.e. be Java and .NET experts so that you get a broad understanding of how industry wide experts work and think.
- Discover tips and tricks about Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring programming
- Get your questions answered by easy to follow, organized Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring experts
- Get up to speed with vital Foundations of Web Design & Web Authoring programming tools
- Save on travel expenses by learning right from your desk or home office. Enroll in an online instructor led class. Nearly all of our classes are offered in this way.
- Prepare to hit the ground running for a new job or a new position
- See the big picture and have the instructor fill in the gaps
- We teach with sophisticated learning tools and provide excellent supporting course material
- Books and course material are provided in advance
- Get a book of your choice from the HSG Store as a gift from us when you register for a class
- Gain a lot of practical skills in a short amount of time
- We teach what we know…software
- We care…